<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.scilab.org/" />
</head>
<body><br>
---------- Bug Summary ----------- <br>filter function is very slow compared to GNU Octave for long FIR's <br><br>
<br>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - filter function is very slow compared to GNU Octave for long FIR's"
href="http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15378#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - filter function is very slow compared to GNU Octave for long FIR's"
href="http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15378">bug 15378</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sgougeon@free.fr" title="Samuel GOUGEON <sgougeon@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Samuel GOUGEON</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Yash Aggarwal from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=15378#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> For octave same commands give:
> Elapsed time is 0.33xxxx seconds.</span >
(In reply to Samuel GOUGEON from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=15378#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> With Scilab 6.0.1 for Windows 7 64 bits:
> --> toc()
> ans =
> 0.3219537</span >
With Octave 4.2.1, on the same computer:
<span class="quote">>> tic(); filter(b,1,x); toc()</span >
Elapsed time is 0.52503 seconds.
So, Scilab 6.0.1 is quite faster than Octave 4.2.1 for this filter() benchmark.
But Octave is not Matlab. Nor is its price.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are watching all bug changes.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>