From sgougeon at free.fr Thu Sep 1 01:31:56 2011 From: sgougeon at free.fr (Samuel Gougeon) Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 01:31:56 +0200 Subject: SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D Message-ID: <4E5EC46C.3020205@free.fr> Hi, Please find attached a simple proposal aiming to add an optional Z input parameter to the existing & already 3D-enable xarrows() function. No back-compatibility issue is expected. Regards Samuel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SEP_069_xarrows_Z_argin.odt Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text Size: 18943 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Serge.Steer at scilab.org Thu Sep 1 12:31:00 2011 From: Serge.Steer at scilab.org (Serge Steer) Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:31:00 +0200 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D In-Reply-To: <4E5EC46C.3020205@free.fr> References: <4E5EC46C.3020205@free.fr> Message-ID: <4E5F5EE4.1000606@scilab.org> Le 01/09/2011 01:31, Samuel Gougeon a ?crit : > Hi, > > Please find attached a simple proposal aiming to add an optional > Z input parameter to the existing & already 3D-enable xarrows() function. > No back-compatibility issue is expected. > > Regards > Samuel Tout ? fait bonne proposition. On pourrait aussi traiter de meme la fonction xstring... Serge -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sylvestre.ledru at scilab.org Thu Sep 1 16:10:44 2011 From: sylvestre.ledru at scilab.org (Sylvestre Ledru) Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:10:44 +0200 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D In-Reply-To: <4E5EC46C.3020205@free.fr> References: <4E5EC46C.3020205@free.fr> Message-ID: <1314886244.3490.2.camel@korcula.inria.fr> Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 ? 01:31 +0200, Samuel Gougeon a ?crit : > Hi, > > Please find attached a simple proposal aiming to add an optional > Z input parameter to the existing & already 3D-enable xarrows() > function. > No back-compatibility issue is expected. For the record (even if it is the document): http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9859 http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9890 Otherwise, I like the idea. Don't forget to strongly check the backward compatibility. Sylvestre From sgougeon at free.fr Thu Sep 1 21:46:01 2011 From: sgougeon at free.fr (Samuel Gougeon) Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:46:01 +0200 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D In-Reply-To: <4E5F5EE4.1000606@scilab.org> References: <4E5EC46C.3020205@free.fr> <4E5F5EE4.1000606@scilab.org> Message-ID: <4E5FE0F9.5000001@free.fr> Le 01/09/2011 12:31, Serge Steer a ?crit : > Tout ? fait bonne proposition. On pourrait aussi traiter de meme la > fonction xstring... Not at as easy as for xarrows() : extending xstring(x,y,str,[angle,box]) to 3D would need also to extend its optional orientation (so with 2 angles instead of 1). There are graphical bugs of that kind but much simpler and that expect processing. But this should be another thread. Samuel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: