[Scilab-Dev] [warning()] Extending management mode for a specific message

[Clément David]

Hello Samuel and good in depth analysis,

To summarize :

Le vendredi 08 avril 2016 à 01:11 +0200, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
> Now, i may understand from your proposal that you don't want to go on this way. 
> You might want to define the look-up table of tagNames only from the setting point of view.
> If so, i am sorry, but i think it is better to not implement this "tag" feature, because it would
> be hardly usable.

Yep exactly, initially I thought about that "tag" or "simplified message" but discarded it due to
the complexity of such a feature and the approaching Scilab 6 release. My need was just to hide the
[]+"" warning temporarly on some user code to check the tests.

> The ["do", instructions] feature does not need such a table. It could already be a great
> improvement, 
> with warning() overloading.

Yep I will try to add that instead of the "stop" feature. The complexity is the same and it will be
easier to manage.

About the naming, I prefer a "execstr" instead of "do" but it might also be possible to simply pass
a function that will be called on warning (similarly to uicontrol's callback). What do you prefer ?

--
Clément