From sgougeon at free.fr Thu Jan 4 20:18:27 2018 From: sgougeon at free.fr (Samuel Gougeon) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 20:18:27 +0100 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] hist3d() => bar3d() : schedule Message-ID: Hello all, I would like to implement the proposal posted @ http://bugzilla.scilab.org/14738 : /hist3d() is a bar3d() and shall be renamed as this. It usurps an actual missing hist3d() to be implemented/. Namely, to rename /hist3d()/ into /bar3d()/ before a /hist3d/() actual reimplementation. If we agree about this evolution -- do we? --, at least two schedules are possible: 1. Schedule #1 1. Scilab 6.0.2 (~2019-01?) : * hist3d() copied into bar3d() * hist3d() tagged as obsolete, inviting to use bar3d() 2. Scilab 6.1.0 (~2020-01?) : former hist3d() removed 3. Scilab 6.2.0 (~2022-01?) : new actual hist3d() implemented 2. Schedule #2 1. Scilab 6.1.0 (~2020-01?) : 1. hist3d() copied into bar3d() 2. hist3d() tagged as obsolete, inviting to use bar3d() 2. Scilab 6.2.0 (~2022-01?) : former hist3d() removed 3. Scilab 6.3.0 (~2024-06?) : new actual hist3d() implemented What's your opinion about this topic? Thanks Samuel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sgougeon at free.fr Mon Jan 8 21:07:58 2018 From: sgougeon at free.fr (Samuel Gougeon) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 21:07:58 +0100 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] hist3d() => bar3d() : schedule In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <28017c9d-f080-e963-d455-faf015c0e50c@free.fr> Hello, Le 04/01/2018 ? 20:18, Samuel Gougeon a ?crit : > > Hello all, > > I would like to implement the proposal posted @ > http://bugzilla.scilab.org/14738 : > > /hist3d() is a bar3d() and shall be renamed as this. It usurps an > actual missing hist3d() to be implemented/. > > > Namely, to rename /hist3d()/ into /bar3d()/ before a /hist3d/() actual > reimplementation. > If we agree about this evolution -- do we? --, at least two schedules > are possible: > > 1. Schedule #1 > 1. Scilab 6.0.2 (~2019-01?) : > * hist3d() copied into bar3d() > * hist3d() tagged as obsolete, inviting to use bar3d() > 2. Scilab 6.1.0 (~2020-01?) : former hist3d() removed > 3. Scilab 6.2.0 (~2022-01?) : new actual hist3d() implemented > > 2. Schedule #2 > 1. Scilab 6.1.0 (~2020-01?) : > 1. hist3d() copied into bar3d() > 2. hist3d() tagged as obsolete, inviting to use bar3d() > 2. Scilab 6.2.0 (~2022-01?) : former hist3d() removed > 3. Scilab 6.3.0 (~2024-06?) : new actual hist3d() implemented > > What's your opinion about this topic? > Without feedback / objection by the next 2 weeks, i will propose to clone hist3d() => bar3d() and will warnobsolete hist3d() on the 6.0.x branch, for the shortest schedule. Thanks. Best regards Samuel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Clement.David at esi-group.com Tue Jan 16 09:12:52 2018 From: Clement.David at esi-group.com (=?utf-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgRGF2aWQ=?=) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:12:52 +0000 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] New contributor to Scilab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1516090370.2132.8.camel@esi-group.com> Hi Anurag and welcome, Please follow the wiki instructions [1], fix a bug or a some coverity issues. Try to make a commit and we will start helping on some concrete code :) . [1]: https://wiki.scilab.org/How%20to%20contribute%20to%20Scilab Thanks, -- Cl?ment Le samedi 23 d?cembre 2017 ? 22:20 -0800, ANURAG TOMAR a ?crit : > Hello everyone, > > I am Anurag Singh Tomar, a 2nd year Engineering Undergraduate pursuing > B.Tech at JIIT Noida. > I am new to open source and want to contribute to Scilab. I will give my best to contribute to > Scilab in whatever way I can :). > I'm new to the code base. Can you tell me where to start ? > I will be very glad to see the response soon. > > Regards, > Anurag Singh Tomar > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev at lists.scilab.org > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev From vincent.b.1 at hotmail.fr Mon Jan 29 18:21:22 2018 From: vincent.b.1 at hotmail.fr (=?utf-8?B?VmluY2VudCBCZWxhw69jaGU=?=) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:21:22 +0000 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15388 Message-ID: Bonjour, D?sol? de vous emb?ter sur votre liste de d?veloppement, je ne doute pas que vous soyez tr?s occup?s... L'anomalie ? 15388 sur laquelle je suis tomb? (lien en objet de ce courriel) est vraiment TR?S emb?tante, car je ne peux pas utiliser Scilab pour faire des bancs d'essai du code que j'ai ?crit... J'ai essay? de recompiler Scilab ? partir des sources aujourd'hui, en esp?rant qu'en utilisant le m?me compilo pour tout je n'aurais plus ce souci de lien dynamique, mais bon, c'est une vraie gage?re, et puis je suis tomb? sur une autre probl?me venant de jogl2. Tout d?but d'aide/suggestion/etc... est plus que bien venu... Je me tiens ? votre disposition si vous avez besoin que je fasse d'autres essais pour obtenir de plus d'info sur le probl?me? ? Vincent. From vincent.b.1 at hotmail.fr Mon Jan 29 19:54:56 2018 From: vincent.b.1 at hotmail.fr (=?utf-8?B?VmluY2VudCBCZWxhw69jaGU=?=) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:54:56 +0000 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15388 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just as a follow up, I had a reply from JOGL maintainer that java 8 has to be used until they fix the bug which I came across (which is java 9 specific). V. ________________________________ De : dev de la part de Vincent Bela?che Envoy? : lundi 29 janvier 2018 18:21:22 ? : dev at lists.scilab.org Objet : [Scilab-Dev] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15388 Bonjour, D?sol? de vous emb?ter sur votre liste de d?veloppement, je ne doute pas que vous soyez tr?s occup?s... L'anomalie ? 15388 sur laquelle je suis tomb? (lien en objet de ce courriel) est vraiment TR?S emb?tante, car je ne peux pas utiliser Scilab pour faire des bancs d'essai du code que j'ai ?crit... J'ai essay? de recompiler Scilab ? partir des sources aujourd'hui, en esp?rant qu'en utilisant le m?me compilo pour tout je n'aurais plus ce souci de lien dynamique, mais bon, c'est une vraie gage?re, et puis je suis tomb? sur une autre probl?me venant de jogl2. Tout d?but d'aide/suggestion/etc... est plus que bien venu... Je me tiens ? votre disposition si vous avez besoin que je fasse d'autres essais pour obtenir de plus d'info sur le probl?me Vincent. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev at lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vincent.b.1 at hotmail.fr Tue Jan 30 11:23:44 2018 From: vincent.b.1 at hotmail.fr (=?utf-8?B?VmluY2VudCBCZWxhw69jaGU=?=) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:23:44 +0000 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15388 In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: OK, I made some update on the bug tracker. I a nutshell what the configure script is testing is inconsistent with current jogl2 library. It seems that you are building with some old version of JOGL2. Vincent. ________________________________ De : dev de la part de Vincent Bela?che Envoy? : lundi 29 janvier 2018 19:54:56 ? : dev at lists.scilab.org Objet : Re: [Scilab-Dev] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15388 Just as a follow up, I had a reply from JOGL maintainer that java 8 has to be used until they fix the bug which I came across (which is java 9 specific). V. ________________________________ De : dev de la part de Vincent Bela?che Envoy? : lundi 29 janvier 2018 18:21:22 ? : dev at lists.scilab.org Objet : [Scilab-Dev] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15388 Bonjour, D?sol? de vous emb?ter sur votre liste de d?veloppement, je ne doute pas que vous soyez tr?s occup?s... L'anomalie ? 15388 sur laquelle je suis tomb? (lien en objet de ce courriel) est vraiment TR?S emb?tante, car je ne peux pas utiliser Scilab pour faire des bancs d'essai du code que j'ai ?crit... J'ai essay? de recompiler Scilab ? partir des sources aujourd'hui, en esp?rant qu'en utilisant le m?me compilo pour tout je n'aurais plus ce souci de lien dynamique, mais bon, c'est une vraie gage?re, et puis je suis tomb? sur une autre probl?me venant de jogl2. Tout d?but d'aide/suggestion/etc... est plus que bien venu... Je me tiens ? votre disposition si vous avez besoin que je fasse d'autres essais pour obtenir de plus d'info sur le probl?me Vincent. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev at lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sgougeon at free.fr Wed Jan 31 20:45:36 2018 From: sgougeon at free.fr (Samuel Gougeon) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 20:45:36 +0100 Subject: [Scilab-Dev] Disturbing changes on CodeReview Message-ID: Hello devs, I noticed some changes on the CodeReview interface since this week: * The download menu of a commit no longer lists parametrized GIT commands to fetchout, cherrypick and push the commit. It is now limited to the Patch-File and Archive rows. This is true whatever is the web browser (observed with FF, Chrome, Safari) * When we review files in diff mode, the edit icon switching the diff mode into the edit one at the top of the diff page no longer works: it yields an error page. Regards Samuel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: