[Scilab-Dev] hist3d() => bar3d() : schedule
Samuel Gougeon
sgougeon at free.fr
Mon Jan 8 21:07:58 CET 2018
Hello,
Le 04/01/2018 à 20:18, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to implement the proposal posted @
> http://bugzilla.scilab.org/14738 :
>
> /hist3d() is a bar3d() and shall be renamed as this. It usurps an
> actual missing hist3d() to be implemented/.
>
>
> Namely, to rename /hist3d()/ into /bar3d()/ before a /hist3d/() actual
> reimplementation.
> If we agree about this evolution -- do we? --, at least two schedules
> are possible:
>
> 1. Schedule #1
> 1. Scilab 6.0.2 (~2019-01?) :
> * hist3d() copied into bar3d()
> * hist3d() tagged as obsolete, inviting to use bar3d()
> 2. Scilab 6.1.0 (~2020-01?) : former hist3d() removed
> 3. Scilab 6.2.0 (~2022-01?) : new actual hist3d() implemented
>
> 2. Schedule #2
> 1. Scilab 6.1.0 (~2020-01?) :
> 1. hist3d() copied into bar3d()
> 2. hist3d() tagged as obsolete, inviting to use bar3d()
> 2. Scilab 6.2.0 (~2022-01?) : former hist3d() removed
> 3. Scilab 6.3.0 (~2024-06?) : new actual hist3d() implemented
>
> What's your opinion about this topic?
>
Without feedback / objection by the next 2 weeks, i will propose to
clone hist3d() => bar3d() and will warnobsolete hist3d() on the 6.0.x
branch, for the shortest schedule.
Thanks.
Best regards
Samuel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20180108/87eb1ce3/attachment.htm>
More information about the dev
mailing list