<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 23/02/2017 à 20:20, Amanda Osvaldo a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1487877654.3907.19.camel@yahoo.es" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div>
<div>* Interaction with users<br>
<br>
No, much more simple XD</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It is possible to put a form for the user to send some
evaluation.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For example, we could put a form on the help menu asking
what it considers to be a priority in the next updates.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Something like this image:</div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/manual-0.34/images/reference/menu_design_issues.png">http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/manual-0.34/images/reference/menu_design_issues.png</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Technically, Bugzilla is ready and could already allow to vote for
any bug fix or wish implementation.<br>
But this feature is currently disabled.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1487877654.3907.19.camel@yahoo.es" type="cite">
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>* % keyword as comment:</div>
<div>It's not for a perfect match, it's just to keep more simple
the process. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Improving the m2sci converter is a matter for the sub-community of
former matlabers.<br>
There is no reason to spend some time to change the language only
for a part of the users,<br>
and sometimes for worse or bad features.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1487877654.3907.19.camel@yahoo.es" type="cite">
<div><b>* Pool of formulas</b></div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote cite="mid:1487877654.3907.19.camel@yahoo.es" type="cite">
<div>Not all formulas are easy, exists formulas with more than 2
pages that has been written by many persons.</div>
<div>And when the update is ready, it is necessary to compare with
the previous version and manually write the update or even the
entire macro.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Teams can be made from people from social and biological
sciences that don't know to implement.</div>
<div>Or even the team may not have access to additional macros to
test the formula for security and intellectual property reasons.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In both cases, automate the running and test process is
necessary to reduce the human work.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>MathML is a XML stantard.</div>
<div>You can write in Libre Office Math (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjpe7a52s18">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjpe7a52s18</a>)
<br>
and the SciLAB's XML macro can convert the XML to code</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Again, definitely not. It aims only to parse XML to build a DOM and
things like this.<br>
In no way it is built to interpret a literal formula and convert it
into some executable code.<br>
You may also have a look at prettyprint(). It works only one way
(the easiest one),<br>
has no reciprocal, and deals only with a limited subset of regular
data types<br>
(not functions or formulae).<br>
<br>
Samuel<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>