<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 22/02/2017 à 21:50, Amanda Osvaldo a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<br>
<b>* File old and blank forges:</b><br>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%">Would not it be
better to file the Atoms that do not work or are simply blank?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%">It's frustrating
...
and a waste of time ... finding a module that is just what I
need and
seeing that it has nothing. :P</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%"><a
href="https://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/python/source/help/">https://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/python/source/help/</a></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Definitely.<br>
<i>uman</i> somewhat does it: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://atoms.scilab.org/toolboxes/uman">http://atoms.scilab.org/toolboxes/uman</a><br>
It was planned that ATOMS modules in the <i>Tests</i> category
should not appear in the list.<br>
But in the Scilab 6 ATOMS client, they still appear.<br>
IMO, for ATOMS's manager, a configuration option shall be added to
not show Test modules,<br>
and be set to "on" by default (cancel Tests). But it must remain
possible to display them,<br>
in order to actually make tests ;)<br>
<br>
Otherwise, authors should be careful about their own modules, their
categories, their update or deprecation, and not creating duplicates
instead of creating new versions.<br>
<br>
SG<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>