Nan indice in min/max

[Frederic Jourdin]

Hi all,
if I run this:

[m, k]=min([ %nan %nan %nan])
 k  =
    1. 
 m  =
    Nan

The result for m is correct but seems incorrect
for k. Is it ? (I am expecting Nan instead).

Thanks
Fred
Scilab 5.3.0 on Linux