[scilab-Users] Scilab 6 syntax?
Process Control
computerprocesscontrol at gmail.com
Sun Jun 19 18:34:32 CEST 2011
great.
I am very interested in creating a power flow analysis toolbox for scilab.
Do you think I should wait for scilab 6 to come out?
regards
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre.ledru at scilab.org
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hopefully, we will be able to release a first (pre?)alpha version of
> Scilab 6 in the next few months.
>
> Sylvestre
>
>
> Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 18:22 -0400, Process Control a écrit :
> > thanks Sylvestre
> >
> > So, when is the expected releaste of scilab 6?
> >
> > regards
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Sylvestre Ledru
> > <sylvestre.ledru at scilab.org> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 05:23 -0400, Process Control a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What is the scilab 6 syntax going to be like?
> > >
> > > What I understand is that the scilab 6 is going to bring a
> > significant
> > > improvement in performance. How is it going to compare to
> > MATLAB and
> > > R?
> >
> > We are trying to introduce minimal changes to avoid
> > incompatibilities.
> > We are improving the Scilab language by removing some bad
> > corner cases
> > and also by adding stuff like cell and some other nice
> > features.
> >
> > Also, some types, which are currently based on other through
> > macros, are
> > going to be native (and therefor much more faster). This
> > increases
> > strongly the performances.
> >
> > All changes will be fully documented with the first testing
> > release of
> > Scilab 6.
> >
> > Sylvestre
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110619/5faca8ed/attachment.htm>
More information about the users
mailing list