[scilab-Users] Re: Xcos, "interpolation" block

[Clément David]

Hi,

In fact the block name (INTRPLBLK_f) should be kept for compatibility
reason.

The help page of the block update is in progress [1], can you post any
remarks there please ?

We are aware of a documentation issue on Xcos blocks and some
contributors are working on it. To help them please contact me off the
list or
 read [2] :) .

[1]: http://codereview.scilab.org/#change,3691
[2]: http://www.scilab.org/communities/developer_zone/contribute

--
Clément

Le jeudi 31 mars 2011 à 02:18 -0700, Jerzy Karczmarczuk a écrit :
> Merci Clément.
> I would just want to suggest to change the name of this block.
> If the parameterization is:   [-1;1] -> [1;-1] this makes -sin(x) from
> sin(x).
> Yes, this is a - somewhat - general mapping from input to output, with
> linear interpolation within segments
> specified in parameters, but calling this "Interpolation" is a semantic
> abomination, misleading.
> 
> In general, the documentation of Xcos needs really some update...
> 
> JK
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Xcos-interpolation-block-tp2751806p2757622.html
> Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Clément David <clement.david at scilab.org>