[scilab-Users] Hybrid Automata Module
Clément David
clement.david at scilab.org
Mon May 2 17:12:54 CEST 2011
Hello,
On the details header, you have a version number for any atoms module.
http://atoms.scilab.org/toolboxes/hyb_auto_module/0.2
Supported Scilab Versions >= 5.3
Quality informations can be left on any module by living a rating
comment.
Regards,
--
Clément
Le lundi 02 mai 2011 à 07:36 -0700, Prof. Dr. Reinaldo Golmia Dante a
écrit :
>
>
> Hello Clemént,
>
> When I access Applications->Module ATOMS, which of them could I
> download ?
>
> I do not know if those modules disable or not my Scilab 5.3.1. I
> suggest that the description of those modules
> could specify the exact Scilab version (e.g., upper 5.3.1) instead of
> showing the date of its development.
> So, it could be easier to Scilab user decides if it is convenient to
> install it or not.
>
> Thank you.
> RGD
>
>
> From: Clément David <clement.david at scilab.org>
> To: users at lists.scilab.org
> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2011 11:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [scilab-Users] Hybrid Automata Module
>
> Hello,
>
> For the use of standard functionnality of Xcos, please do not install
> external modules. Some of them improve Xcos features by hidding them
> but
> problems would be harder to find.
>
> For exemple "Hybrid Automata Module", redefine features of a masked
> super-blocks and thus disable this standard feature.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Clément DAVID
>
> Le lundi 02 mai 2011 à 07:05 -0700, Prof. Dr. Reinaldo Golmia Dante a
> écrit :
> > Hi Scilab users,
> >
> > I downloaded Scilab 5.3.1 64 bits and installed it.
> >
> > I do not know if it is necessary in this Scilab version to install
> > Hybrid Automata Module.
> > However, I installed it through Applications -> Module ATOMS and
> when
> > I started
> > Scilab appeared the following message:
> >
> > Start Hybrid Automata Module for Scilab/Xcos
> > Load macros
> > Warning : redefining function: DSUPER . Use
> > funcprot(0) to avoid this message
> > Load gateways
> > Load help
> > Load demos
> >
> >
> > Is it correct to appear that "warning" and "redefining function
> > DSUPER" ?
> > Or is it better drop it ?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > All best,
> > Reinaldo.
>
> --
> Clément David <clement.david at scilab.org>
>
>
>
>
--
Clément David <clement.david at scilab.org>
More information about the users
mailing list