[Scilab-users] perfomnace decease (scilab 5.4.0-beta3)

[Mathieu Dubois]

Hello,

Maybe this is related to the option used to compile the beta version 
(like enabling debugging, less optimization, etc.).

You could try to compile it yourself from the source...

HTH,
Mathieu

Le 01/09/2012 14:18, kjubo a écrit :
> hello,
>
> im testing performance of scilab with my own file (heat transfer
> computation),
> which consist of for cycles and if conditions. i found that scilab
> 5.4(beta3) runs 60% slower than other scilab version. have you any
> explanation to this behavior?
> (im testing on the same hardware every time, windows OS)
> here are my results, attached exec file.
>
> thanks
>
> Jakub Kopáč
>
>
>
> results:
> //SCILAB BENCHMARK
> // heat transfer 2D
> //scilab 4.1.2 272sek
> //scilab 5.2.2 320sek
> //scilab 5.3.0-beta1 295sec
> //scilab 5.3.0-beta2 293sec
> //scilab 5.3.0-beta3 296sec
> //scilab 5.3.0-SSE3  286sec
> //scilab 5.3.1       302sec
> //scilab 5.3.2-64bit 265sec
> //scilab 5.4.0-beta3 483sec
>
> http://mailinglists.scilab.org/file/n4024765/bench_prestup_tepla.sce
> bench_prestup_tepla.sce
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/perfomnace-decease-scilab-5-4-0-beta3-tp4024765.html
> Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>