[Scilab-users] Surface smoothing in Scilab, immune to outliers
Stéphane Mottelet
stephane.mottelet at utc.fr
Mon Mar 4 14:13:51 CET 2013
Hello,
Replacing the squared L2 norm by the L1 norm in the linear regression
gives a good robustness to outliers (cf. Donoho and al. papers). The
problem is then non differentiable but you can implement it by
iteratively reweighting the classical L2 method (IRLS method), or by
writing an equivalent linear program.
S.
Le 04/03/13 13:23, Dang, Christophe a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> De la part de Rafael Guerra
> Envoyé : lundi 4 mars 2013 04:37
>
>> Does somebody know if there are Scilab functions
>> [...] that smooths
>> experimental data z=f(x,y) and is immune to strong outliers.
> imho, the problem with smoothing and outliers is that
> the definition of a outlier depends on the field.
>
> How can Scilab know what a "strong outlier" is?
>
> I personally would try Fourier filtering:
> a strong outlier means a steep slope
> and therefore correspond to a high frequency.
>
> Thus fft2, set high frequencies to 0
> (with possibly a smooth transition),
> then inverse fft2 -- ifft2 does not exist, I never used 2-dimension
> Fourier transform so I don't know if the inverse is easy to perform...
>
More information about the users
mailing list