[Scilab-users] Regarding simple numerical operations result display.

[Stefan Du Rietz]

On 2013-03-19 11:43, Serge Steer wrote:
--------------------
> Le 19/03/2013 11:26, Dang, Christophe a écrit :
>> De la part de Stefan Du Rietz
>> Envoyé : mardi 19 mars 2013 11:10
>>
>>> But gsort is a built-in function (and very efficient):
>> I just wonder if it can be as efficient if you write your own function
>> and then compile it with comp().
> Note that comp is now made automatically when you define a Scilab
> function, but comp only generate a pre-interpreted code not a
> processor binary code so gsort which is a built-in (processor binary
> code) will be in any case much more efficient.
>
Serge, can you please also tell us what "pre-interpreted" implies 
regarding loops?

Best regards
Stefan