[Scilab-users] ode malfunction

[Adrien Vogt-Schilb]

Serge,

I suggest that an optional argument for ode would be a set of dates 
where the function is singular, so ode manages this by itself. What do 
you think?

BR
Adrien


On 16/10/2013 03:46, Serge Steer wrote:
> Take care that the ode  requires the function being at least  
> continuous and differentiable
> If your input signal has singularities (points where it nos 
> differentiable) you must stop the integration at this point and 
> restart it just after taking the last state value as the intial point 
> for the second run.
>
> Serge Steer
>
> Le 15/10/2013 17:46, Peter Hinow a écrit :
>> Dear fellows,
>>
>> my goal is to solve numerically an ODE which contains a time-dependent parameter using 'ode'. I get a confusing result depending on whether the signal (it's called h) is on for 10 or 20 seconds. The two results are attached. Regardless of the model and the code, there should be a response in the variable w as soon as h switches from 0 to 1. I can provide any other information as needed.
>>
>> Should I use bugzilla to report this? I am not doing this very often, so I need some instruction how to proceed.
>> Thank you and best regards,
>>        Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at lists.scilab.org
>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users


-- 
Adrien Vogt-Schilb
PhD Student (Cired) and Consultant (The World Bank)
1 202 473 79 80

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131016/93839319/attachment.htm>