[Scilab-users] Faster PWM signal

Michael Greenish greanie at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 16 11:14:18 CEST 2015


@Serge: Thank you for the idea!
I found my problem for running faster.  It turns out the slope of the triangle waveform is independent of the period so I had to apply a greater gain for the sawtooth for it to cross zero.  Now I am running at 50kHz.

Thanks,
Michael Greenish
      From: Serge Steer <Serge.Steer at inria.fr>
 To: users at lists.scilab.org 
 Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 9:50 AM
 Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] Faster PWM signal
   
 Try with lower solver tolerances  with the Simulate/Confiure menu.
 
 Serge Steer
 Le 15/10/2015 18:53, Michael Greenish a écrit :
  
 

 Hello, 
  I am modeling an electrical circuit.  I have a voltage across an inductor being switched on the ground side.  I am generating a pwm using a sawtooth genartor as shown by the attached image.  In my circuit, my PWM switches at 50kHz.  When if I set the sawtooth generator period to > 0.025, the results look as expected on the graphs.  If the sawtooth generate period is < 0.025, the results are flat; the system can't seem to calculate at that interval.  The period on the timer attached to the scope is 0.0001.
  
  I am only at 25ms, I need to get to 0.02 ms to match my real-life circuit.  Is there a limit of the system I am running into or do I have a parameter wrong? 
  Thanks, 
  Mike Greenish
  
   
  
 _______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20151016/ddd14904/attachment.htm>


More information about the users mailing list