[Scilab-users] Wrong number of arguments? exclusive) to exclusive)

[Rafael Guerra]

Hi Buk.

I think that for your data, the Loess (or Lowess) technique provided superior
results. Why does it not suit you?
Note that the parameters used in my plots were smoothing=0.03 (not 0.3) and
order=2 or 3 but I would recommend using order=1 or 2 instead.

PS: regarding the 3-point median example in your last email, you did not remove
the +5e-3 shift as I told you to do (this was introduced for display purposes in
the first code sample).

Rgds
Rafael



----Original Message-----
From: users [mailto:users-bounces at lists.scilab.org] On Behalf Of
scilab.20.browseruk at xoxy.net
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 3:38 AM
To: users at lists.scilab.org
Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] Wrong number of arguments? exclusive) to exclusive)

Rafeal,

Looking back I realise that I may have appeared that I dismissed your suggestion
without reason.

Please see the attachment for an example of the problems I encountered when I
ran your code against a bunch of files.

Thank you for your time and expertise in assisting me,

Buk.

____________________________________________________________
Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages
Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click.
Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out!