[Scilab-users] Scilab 6.0.0, read()

[Stefan Du Rietz]

Here you are, Lester! A script that generates a comparatively small 
data file and then reads it is attached.

In a small laptop computer with Windows 10 and 32-bit versions of Scilab:

Scilab-5.5.2:

size(mat) = [10000  7]
mat took 0.08 sec to read.
size(mat) = [10000  7]

Scilab-6.0.0:

size(mat) = [10000  7]
mat took 39.14 sec to read.
size(mat) = [10000  7]

Regards
Stefan


On 2017-02-22 11:43, Lester Anderson wrote:
> Haven't got as far as testing the functions, but just starting version
> 6 compared to 5.5.2 is slower; not sure what is going on. Testing on
> Windows 8.1 (4 Gb RAM).
>
> Do you have a test script to try, see if the issue can be reproduced?
>
> Cheers
> Lester
>
> On 22 February 2017 at 10:15, Stefan Du Rietz <sdr at durietz.se> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I got Scilab 6 to work in a Windows 10 laptop. However, my loading of data
>> with read() took almost half an hour.
>> From toc() and mprintf():
>> Loading of data took 26 min 23 sec
>>
>> In Scilab 5.5.2 it took just over a second.
>> From toc() and mprintf():
>> Loading of data took 1.219 sec.
>>
>> What happened?
>>
>> Regards
>> Stefan
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at lists.scilab.org
>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_read.sce
Type: application/x-scilab
Size: 433 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170222/85f29309/attachment.bin>