[Scilab-users] Scilab 6.0.0, read()

[Philipp Mühlmann]

another test out of curiosity

Windows 7 - 64 bit
8 GB Ram
8 Prozessoren


Scilab 5.4.1  (64bit)
mat took 0.03 sec to read.
size(mat) = [10000  7]

Scilab 5.5.1  (64 bit)
mat took 0.03 sec to read.
size(mat) = [10000  7]


Scilab 6.0.0  (64 bit)
mat took 8.59 sec to read.
size(mat) = [10000  7]



2017-02-23 7:42 GMT+01:00 Lester Anderson <arctica1963 at gmail.com>:

> Thanks Stefan for the script:
>
> Windows 8.1 (64-bit) 4 Gb RAM
>
> Program load time (approx)
> 5.5.2 ~9 seconds (with modules installed)
> 6.0.0 ~20 seconds (no modules)
>
> 5.5.2 results:
> size(mat) = [10000  7]
> mat took 0.04 sec to read.
> size(mat) = [10000  7]
>
> 6.0.0 results:
> size(mat) = [10000  7]
> mat took 13.62 sec to read.
> size(mat) = [10000  7
>
> Cheers
> Lester
>
> On 22 February 2017 at 17:30, Stefan Du Rietz <sdr at durietz.se> wrote:
> > Here you are, Lester! A script that generates a comparatively small data
> > file and then reads it is attached.
> >
> > In a small laptop computer with Windows 10 and 32-bit versions of Scilab:
> >
> > Scilab-5.5.2:
> >
> > size(mat) = [10000  7]
> > mat took 0.08 sec to read.
> > size(mat) = [10000  7]
> >
> > Scilab-6.0.0:
> >
> > size(mat) = [10000  7]
> > mat took 39.14 sec to read.
> > size(mat) = [10000  7]
> >
> > Regards
> > Stefan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2017-02-22 11:43, Lester Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> Haven't got as far as testing the functions, but just starting version
> >> 6 compared to 5.5.2 is slower; not sure what is going on. Testing on
> >> Windows 8.1 (4 Gb RAM).
> >>
> >> Do you have a test script to try, see if the issue can be reproduced?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Lester
> >>
> >> On 22 February 2017 at 10:15, Stefan Du Rietz <sdr at durietz.se> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>> I got Scilab 6 to work in a Windows 10 laptop. However, my loading of
> >>> data
> >>> with read() took almost half an hour.
> >>> From toc() and mprintf():
> >>> Loading of data took 26 min 23 sec
> >>>
> >>> In Scilab 5.5.2 it took just over a second.
> >>> From toc() and mprintf():
> >>> Loading of data took 1.219 sec.
> >>>
> >>> What happened?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Stefan
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> users mailing list
> >>> users at lists.scilab.org
> >>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> users mailing list
> >> users at lists.scilab.org
> >> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > users at lists.scilab.org
> > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>



-- 
In Kanada is' ka' na' da. Sonst wär' Kanada Jemanda.

There we have the salad.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170223/6354ecd7/attachment.htm>