[Scilab-users] Matlab vs Scilab perf

[Ricardo Fabbri]

+1 for the fact that Python is much less simple than Scilab, period.
It has a scalability and general-purpose language niche, but to begin
with, it is too strongly typed for a lab language. And Python
interactive data exporation GUI is not as strong yet AFAIK.

--
Dr Ricardo Fabbri
Professor of Computer Engineering
GNU/Linux registered user #175401
pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPRJ
labmacambira.sf.net
rfabbri.github.io


On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Stéphane Mottelet
<stephane.mottelet at utc.fr> wrote:
>
>
> Le 02/03/2017 à 23:23, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> As a conclusion, i think that introducing non-optimal syntaxes or
>> duplicates etc in the language hurts much more than introducing a quite slow
>> algorithm. Simply because the algorithm can be changed later without
>> breaking anything, while introducing badly designed syntaxes or usages is
>> much harder to manage afterwards, and impedes much more learning, using and
>> maintaining the language.
>
> You are *so* right Samuel...
>
> S.
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Samuel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at lists.scilab.org
>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users