[Scilab-users] compiling scilab

Martin Marmsoler martin.marmsoler at gmail.com
Mon Mar 27 22:51:16 CEST 2017


Yes it worked to compile :)

2017-03-27 21:38 GMT+02:00 Martin Marmsoler <martin.marmsoler at gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> yes I will try it.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Martin
>
> 2017-03-27 17:47 GMT+02:00 Clément David <Clement.David at esi-group.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On my machine, with the patch [1] I am able to build scilab. Could you
>> open a bug to track the issue
>>  and confirm that this patch works in your distribution ?
>>
>> [1]: https://codereview.scilab.org/#/c/19232
>>
>> --
>> Clément
>>
>> Le dimanche 26 mars 2017 à 21:15 +0200, Martin Marmsoler a écrit :
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > it worked for me to use the --without-modelica option for the config
>> file and -j1 with make.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> > 2017-03-24 11:17 GMT+01:00 Florian Blachère <florian.blachere at uvsq.fr>:
>> > > Hello,
>> > > I can confirm that with a recent Ocaml compiler (4.04.0) on Archlinux
>> using the PKGBUILD from
>> > > the AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scilab/) and with
>> modelica activated ('--with-
>> > > modelica') the build fails even with the '-j1' option.
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Florian
>> > > On 24/03/17 09:53, Clément David wrote:
>> > > > Hello all,
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry for answering that late, I can offer more :) .
>> > > >
>> > > > The error comes from the buggy parallel OCaml compilation of the
>> Modelica compiler. This is a
>> > > > known
>> > > > issue and I currently failed to resolve it : you should compile
>> with `make -j1` to succeed.
>> > > >
>> > > > I was only able to reproduce it on system using OCaml 4 and it
>> seems to be related to a wrong
>> > > > ml/mli
>> > > > dependency order. Could you confirm that you are using the latest
>> OCaml version ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Clément
>> > > >
>> > > > Le jeudi 23 mars 2017 à 12:21 +0300, Nikolay Strelkov a écrit :
>> > > > > Dear Martin!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > First of all can't understand why you are trying to compile
>> Scilab.
>> > > > > You can get binary version, extract and use it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > At second you can get Scilab from AUR. If you still willing to
>> compile Scilab from sources
>> > > > > you
>> > > > > should install its build dependencies.
>> > > > > I think you can start building Scilab 6.0.0 (commit
>> > > > > 22bd3a5c93489bce74fbaf25d19fe55aefca853c).
>> > > > > After successful build of 6.0.0 you can try newer revisions.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. Here we use "apt-get build-dep
>> scilab", "checkinstall" and so on.
>> > > > > So I
>> > > > > can't offer more.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > With best regards,
>> > > > > Ph.D., assistant professor at MPEI,
>> > > > > IEEE member,
>> > > > > maintainer of Mathieu functions toolbox for Scilab,
>> > > > > Nikolay Strelkov.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2017-03-23 1:02 GMT+03:00 Martin Marmsoler <
>> martin.marmsoler at gmail.com>:
>> > > > > > I'm using antergos and cloned the code from scilab website.
>> > > > > > GNU Make 4.2.1
>> > > > > > 4.10.3-1-ARCH
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 2017-03-22 22:29 GMT+01:00 Tim Wescott <tim at wescottdesign.com>:
>> > > > > > > On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 22:19 +0100, Martin Marmsoler wrote:
>> > > > > > > > Hello,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I tried to compile scilab, but I get every the the
>> following error:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > File "_none_", line 1:
>> > > > > > > > Error: Files ./src/xml2modelica/xMLParser.cmx
>> > > > > > > >        and ./src/xml2modelica/linenum.cmx
>> > > > > > > >        make inconsistent assumptions over implementation
>> Linenum
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > It's revision: 8e22c1833d5be739f39ca4008582952f2d76cfdc
>> > > > > > > > Tried also revision 37f503cc29e63e42902b4de384e9f7
>> c064b76b92
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I do _not_ know the answer, but someone is going to ask you
>> for
>> > > > > > > platform, operating system, and the version of the tools that
>> you're
>> > > > > > > using.  Then they're going to want to know where you got your
>> source
>> > > > > > > code (unless it's obvious from the revision numbers).
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Sorry I can't offer more...
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Tim Wescott
>> > > > > > > www.wescottdesign.com
>> > > > > > > Control & Communications systems, circuit & software design.
>> > > > > > > Phone: 503.631.7815
>> > > > > > > Cell:  503.349.8432
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > users mailing list
>> > > > > > > users at lists.scilab.org
>> > > > > > > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > users mailing list
>> > > > > > users at lists.scilab.org
>> > > > > > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > users mailing list
>> > > > > users at lists.scilab.org
>> > > > > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > users mailing list
>> > > > users at lists.scilab.org
>> > > > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > users mailing list
>> > > users at lists.scilab.org
>> > > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > users mailing list
>> > users at lists.scilab.org
>> > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at lists.scilab.org
>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170327/04af125f/attachment.htm>


More information about the users mailing list