[Scilab-users] == and : relative priorities, as in 0==-1:1
Rafael Guerra
jrafaelbguerra at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 31 22:04:08 CEST 2018
Hi Samuel,
Parsing p==-1:1 as p==(-1:1) would make Scilab output:
ans =
F T F
consistent with Matlab:
ans =
1x3 logical array
0 1 0
And with Octave:
ans =
0 1 0
Regards,
Rafael
From: users <users-bounces at lists.scilab.org> On Behalf Of Samuel Gougeon
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 9:52 PM
To: International users mailing list for Scilab. <users at lists.scilab.org>
Subject: [Scilab-users] == and : relative priorities, as in 0==-1:1
Hello,
Here is a strange -- rather unexpected -- trivial behavior:
--> p = 0; p==-1:1
Undefined operation for the given operands.
check or define function %b_b_s for overloading.
I would have expected [%f %t %f], but "==" 's priority is higher than ":"'s one,
and the expression is parsed (p==-1):1.
It's the same with other comparisons, like p>-1:1.
It was the same behavior in Scilab 5.5.2.
Since by default ":" is defined and meaningful for a very limited
set of operands types: numbers and text (, and that ":" does not
accept a vector as operands), what about inverting the comparisons
and ":" relative priorities, in order to parse p==(-1:1) ?
"~" and comparisons relative priorities are inverted in Scilab 6.
That's more handy. IMO here is another opportunity get a more
relevant and handy behavior, by inverting ":" and comparisons ones.
Don't you think so?
Regards
Samuel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180731/e3e482d4/attachment.htm>
More information about the users
mailing list