[Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

[P M]

Mh. Nice Idea.

Maybe something like this is already possible?

Install toolboxed but remove from autoloader.
So scilab starts without toolboxed from atoms.

The script includes than the command,  which module shall be loaded.

Thanks for the idea...i will try this.
Philipp




Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020 schrieb Claus Futtrup <cfuttrup at gmail.com>:

> Hi all
>
> I imagine naming conflicts can occur across different ATOMS.
>
> How about a change where one has to specify which ATOMS module you're
> using when calling a function, such that both can coexist side-by-side ?
>
> I'm thinking Pythonic here, like if you import for example numpy, you can
> write import numpy as np ... from hereon, you write np.pi for the
> definition of pi (=3.14159 ... ), and so on.
>
> Maybe something for Scilab 7 (?)
>
> Cheers,
> Claus
>
> On 24-11-2020 14:15, P M wrote:
>
> Dear developers,
>
> as I have many scripts with "imread" I wonder if some time in the future
> duplicate functions names from IPCV and SCICV are going to be
> removed/changed.
>
> It's kind of disturbing to have to use atomsInstall/atomsRemove when using
> different scripts.
>
> I think this was discussed already in the past, though an update would be
> nice.
>
> Thank you,
> Philipp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing listusers at lists.scilab.orghttp://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20201124/7786c363/attachment.htm>