[Scilab-users] clarification in data type preciscion needed

P M p.muehlmann at gmail.com
Sun Dec 5 07:23:30 CET 2021


... Is it possible to delete this question?

I guess a int64_t variable should not be represented by a floating point
datatype...

Scilab 6 offers int64 datatype... Seems more correct.

BR
Philipp




Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2021 schrieb P M <p.muehlmann at gmail.com>:

> Dear programmers,
>
> I need/want to follow some C-library code with Scilab.
>
> The C-libarary defines a lot of variables by "int64_t".
>
> - So far I understand int64_t is a datatype of exactly 64bit length     (8
> byte signed integer)
>
>
>
> What would be the correct equivalent data type in Scilab?
>
> - Normally I'd use doubles in Scilab, but is that correct?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Philipp
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20211205/0d6a3f45/attachment.htm>


More information about the users mailing list