[Scilab-users] atomsLoad

Jean-Yves Baudais Jean-Yves.Baudais at insa-rennes.fr
Mon Jan 4 18:01:11 CET 2021


The difference between emd_toolbox-1.2-1 and emd_toolbox-1.3 are the "void *pvApiCtx" added in cemdc.c, cemdc2.c, cemdc_fix.c, cemdc2_fix.c, emdc.c and emdc_fix.c. Could that be the source of the memory problem?

Jean-Yves

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jean-Yves Baudais" <Jean-Yves.Baudais at insa-rennes.fr>
> To: "Users mailing list for Scilab" <users at lists.scilab.org>
> Sent: Monday, 4 January, 2021 16:16:42
> Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] atomsLoad

> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stéphane Mottelet" <stephane.mottelet at utc.fr>
>> Le 04/01/2021 à 15:55, Jean-Yves Baudais a écrit :
>>> It remains one problem: the memory used always increases. If emd() function is
>>> ran multiple times, my 8G mem is fulfilled by scilab and of course scilab
>>> crashes. Maybe this comes from the modified sources of emd_toolbox done by
>>> Stephane Mottelet?
>> 
>> Surely not. I just removed one obsolete #include and didn't touch
>> anything else. The memory leak was already present in the original source...
> 
> 
> I checked "diff" of sci files in emd_toolbox-1.3 and emd_toolbox-1.2.1 (the one
> working on scilab-5.5.2). The differences I found are about emd_ prefix added
> to function names (and the incomprehensible remove of moc_fliplr). I will check
> the c code.
> 
> Jean-Yves
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
Jean-Yves Baudais



More information about the users mailing list