[Scilab-users] [question] xcos yielding different result than SIMULINK

Stéphane Mottelet stephane.mottelet at utc.fr
Thu Feb 10 11:42:23 CET 2022


In Xcos the results are virtually the same with a plain PID block (with 
the same parameters). The chosen solver (CVODE/BDF) is OK to me.

Le 10/02/2022 à 11:06, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Le 10/02/2022 à 10:35, Foad Sojoodi Farimani a écrit :
>> I had initially asked the question here 
>> <https://discordapp.com/channels/384316553497280512/384325768685027328/941093238436134912> 
>> on xcos Discord channel <https://discord.gg/KeG3rdQ>.
>> Basically, I want to replicate this SIMULINK tutorial 
>> <https://youtu.be/PRFCBVTFy90> in xcos, and so far you may see the 
>> .zcox file in the attachment. However, my plots in xcos are quite 
>> different from the ones in the above YouTube video.
>
>
> The video is 26mn long, with several versions of the diagram. Which 
> version are you addressing?
> Wrt to the version at 19:00, why do you skip the 1/s block and adds an 
> INTEGRAL_m block in your sent version ?
>
> Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20220210/21e1a578/attachment.htm>


More information about the users mailing list