<html>
<body>
Hello, <br><br>
So I gather from that that intersci is at the moment still the way to go
in case you want things to work out-of-the-box.<br><br>
Are there known problems with the x64 implementation of intersci? I get,
for a DLL that is compiled x64 and linked against the x64 scilab import
libraries, the following message after addinter:<br><br>
<font face="Courier, Courier" size=2>Shared archive loaded.<br>
Link done.<br>
sluofuncs_ is not an entry point.<br>
Shared archive loaded.<br>
Link done.<br>
sluofuncs is not an entry point.<br>
addinter([dllName],'sluofuncs',sluofuncsfuns);<br>
!--error 999 <br>
addinter: An error occurred: The specified module could not be found.
<br><br>
</font>The module can most certainly be found, and gets loaded as well.
It complains about the "sluofuncs_" entrypoint not being there,
but it is there (can easily verify that, e.g. with the dependency
viewer). The entrypoints are all generated with intersci-n.exe and
f2c.exe and exactly the same procedure works fine for the x86
version.<br><br>
Thank you, <br><br>
Best wishes, <br><br>
Jasper.<br><br>
At 09:16 4/26/2011, Vincent COUVERT wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hi,<br><br>
The SWIG implementation is not yet released but is available in a
dedicated branch [1]. We are still working on it and hope this will be
included in a future SWIG official release.<br><br>
Best Regards.<br><br>
[1]
<a href="http://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/swig/branches/gsoc2009-sploving/" eudora="autourl">
http://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/swig/branches/gsoc2009-sploving/</a>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
Le 25/04/11 16:15, jasper van baten a écrit :<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hello All,<br><br>
I read in the 5.3.1 documentation that intersci is obsolete, and is to be
replaced by SWIG. Is this SWIG implementation ready to use at this point?
Is there any documentation?<br><br>
Best wishes,<br><br>
Jasper.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote></body>
</html>