<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 09/11/2017 à 10:08, Samuel Gougeon a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:080a2b95-981b-2607-fdfd-275fd51c4b2b@free.fr"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello Christophe,<br>
<br>
Le 09/11/2017 à 09:31, Dang Ngoc Chan, Christophe a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:AM4PR0701MB2161ACD513A9EB949910E917E5570@AM4PR0701MB2161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello,
When I used a script written for 5.4 with 6.0,
I noticed some weird things with the continuation mark "..".
E.g. in 5.4,
"abc...
def"
was OK, it now gives an error ; I have to fix it with
"abc"+...
"def"</pre>
</blockquote>
Indeed, it was not a documented CHANGE in the 6.0.0 release. This
official change has been added in CHANGES for 6.0.1.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:AM4PR0701MB2161ACD513A9EB949910E917E5570@AM4PR0701MB2161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Additionally, there should be a space after a * or a / ; *this is not documented*.
This is quite logical as "/." is a different operator.
But "*." Is not an operator.
Only "-." Is documented.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
"*." is documented as well:<br>
<br>
<font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace" size="-1">--> uman
* dl<br>
===========================================================================================================<br>
<br>
Scilab > Scilab keywords > star<br>
...............................<br>
<br>
star - (*) multiplication operator<br>
<br>
Description<br>
-----------<br>
.../...<br>
A*.B is an operator with no predefined meaning. It may be used
to define<br>
a new operator (see overloading) with the same precedence as *
or /.<br>
</font><br>
But i somewhat agree with you: the parser should behave in the
same way for all dotted<br>
operators. So a report could indeed be filled in, about "*." and
".."<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Hmm, actually, i am not so sure that the current behavior is wrong:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 09/11/2017 à 09:31, Dang Ngoc
Chan, Christophe a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:AM4PR0701MB2161ACD513A9EB949910E917E5570@AM4PR0701MB2161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">.../...
--> 5*..
syntax error , unexpected .</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
That's right, in the way that "*." is parsed before ".."<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote
cite="mid:AM4PR0701MB2161ACD513A9EB949910E917E5570@AM4PR0701MB2161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">--> 5*...
> 2
Opération indéfinie pour les opérandes données.</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
Unless you have actually overloaded "*." -- have you? --, this looks
also right.<br>
<br>
Samuel<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>