<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hello Clément, hello Antoine,<br>
</p>
<p>I have two similar requests about anticipating the first Scilab
6.1 release (likely in feb. 2019?): Would it be possible</p>
<ul>
<li>on the ATOMS website, administration page of modules, binaries
management section: to add a "6.1" flag in order to become able
to upload and manage packages for Scilab 6.1 from now? Releasing
a Scilab version with an empty ATOMS list is indeed almost
useless.<br>
About this topic: in the 6.1 release, adding the 6.0 repository
in the default repositories list would be highly welcome. This
could even become a rule: for any 6.x version, having the 6.x
and the 6.(x-1) as default reachable repositories would avoid
breaking most of users habits, what's rather the situation with
Scilab 6.0.<br>
<br>
</li>
<li>on the bugzilla website: add a "6.1.0 (master)" item in the
versions list (it could be renamed "6.1.0" when releasing it)?
Many bugs fixes for stability are being included in Scilab
master, and to me it becomes worthwhile <a
href="https://build.scilab.org/view/Scilab%20master/">working
with the master</a>, 6.0 being so unstable.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
<p>Samuel</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>