<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 13/09/2019 à 15:32, Stéphane
Mottelet a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2b22db77-ab5e-03a5-f3f9-9527dff39b56@utc.fr"> .../...<br>
OK Samuel, I can forget this one. However, "double" should be kept
as an equivalent of "constant", even if not the name of a scilab
type returned by typeof(). We already have the macro "double()"
(instead of "constant()") and the keyword "double" used everywhere
in the API.<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>AFAIR, in the commit, i was arguing against "constant", not
against "double".<br>
IMO both can be implemented (to be able to automate the option out
of typeof()).<br>
But <i>documenting</i> "constant" as acceptable keyword would
make me ill.<br>
It's not an issue. Anyone else will be able to do it :-)</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>