<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 14/11/2019 à 09:07, Dang Ngoc Chan,
Christophe a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DB6PR07MB4344756327752E1DDEF1FDF3E5710@DB6PR07MB4344.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Hello,
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">De : Federico Miyara
Envoyé : mercredi 13 novembre 2019 22:31
Wofai, Chinagorom, Apebo,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
I also started to answer but I'm puzzled by the batch of short questions originating from new subscribers with a Gmail address.
It looks like spamming:
searching for messages in the archives,
posting something inspired by that to appear legitimate, then posting a link to a commercial or fishing URL.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
Yes, but since there is no url redirection in the messages, i
would rather wonder about some people in the same academic class,
with some questions feeding an exam session...<br>
And we, feeding their answer.<br>
;-)<br>
Anyway, i personnaly do not see a reason to take 20 s to answer to
some subscribers that did not take 5 s to put a subject and that
evidently did not spend 15 more seconds to look around the
official website and all redirections, noticeably to the online
documentation.<br>
</p>
<p>I guess that it might also be an exam about how to create a robot
creating an account and spamming a test target.<br>
The last question was about how to make the robot unsubscribing.
And one have failed.<br>
;-)<br>
<br>
Now, i am aware that this is just an how-to take 5 mn to wonder
and comment about not taking 20 s to answer to some improbable
spam..<br>
</p>
<p>Best,<br>
Samuel</p>
<p>PS: IMHO, the best way to deter such practice is to shortly and
massively answer <i>in private</i> to such mails.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>