<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=FR link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Hello Clément,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Yes, I have some function blocks and expression blocks.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Must I understand that I have to write CBLOCK for scilab function or scilab expression or both ?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Here are other results for a more complex project name PELT1<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Time request : 100 s<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Results :<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Xcos Scilab 5.5.2 :<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Durée de la simulation : 258.3 s<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Xcos Sciab 6.1.0 :<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Durée de la simulation : 4353.4 s<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So the ratio is 16.8 for PELT1<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Other information :<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Scilab 5.5.2 : time between click go and first scope on the screen = 5 s<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Scilab 6.1.0 : time between click go and first scope on the screen = 95 s<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Ratio=19<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>…and I also have other projects more complex<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Pelt1 is for 1 needle (2 positonning loop)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Perlt6 for 6 !!! (7 positonning loop)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>BR<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b>De :</b> users <users-bounces@lists.scilab.org> <b>De la part de</b> Clément David<br><b>Envoyé :</b> vendredi 28 février 2020 10:10<br><b>À :</b> Users mailing list for Scilab <users@lists.scilab.org><br><b>Objet :</b> Re: [Scilab-users] Xcos 6.1.0 - benchmark time test<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Hello Pierre,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Are you using a block with its simulation function implemented in Scilab? Any C/C++ implemented block might perform the same at simulation time.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>In 6.0.2, implementing Xcos blocks using the Scilab language had some performance issues. In 6.1.0, I tried to speed up things a little bit by reusing some allocated data structure during simulation time [1] ; more work might still be needed here.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>[1]: <a href="http://cgit.scilab.org/scilab/commit/?id=bfe4f25275dc0d889817d10b63e10c9a0641ef32">http://cgit.scilab.org/scilab/commit/?id=bfe4f25275dc0d889817d10b63e10c9a0641ef32</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>--<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Clément<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US> users <<a href="mailto:users-bounces@lists.scilab.org">users-bounces@lists.scilab.org</a>> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Perrichon<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, February 28, 2020 8:51 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'Users mailing list for Scilab' <<a href="mailto:users@lists.scilab.org">users@lists.scilab.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> [Scilab-users] Xcos 6.1.0 - benchmark time test<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal>Hello,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Here I test a PELTON basic algorithm under xcos, and record with tic-toc the simulation real time.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>These programs have been set for 120 s (scope)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Results :<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Xcos Scilab 5.5.2 :<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Durée de la simulation : 45.4 s<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Xcos Sciab 6.1.0 :<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Durée de la simulation : 65.2 s<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So the ratio is 1.44 for a basic sheme<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Any explaination ?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Can that be improved ?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>BR<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></body></html>