<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 10/02/2022 à 11:06, Samuel Gougeon a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:3491df39-ae38-1c4f-b4ad-e851873db0db@free.fr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello,<br>
<br>
Le 10/02/2022 à 10:35, Foad Sojoodi Farimani a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADjqfdoSa=mB3X3=NnqrJDgikniBsxhUyKGBh2EEG+8sZ90n+w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">I had initially asked the question <a
href="https://discordapp.com/channels/384316553497280512/384325768685027328/941093238436134912"
moz-do-not-send="true">here</a> on <a
href="https://discord.gg/KeG3rdQ" moz-do-not-send="true">xcos
Discord channel</a>.
<div>Basically, I want to replicate <a
href="https://youtu.be/PRFCBVTFy90" moz-do-not-send="true">this
SIMULINK tutorial</a> in xcos, and so far you may see the
.zcox file in the attachment. However, my plots in xcos are
quite different from the ones in the above YouTube video.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The video is 26mn long, with several versions of the diagram.
Which version are you addressing?<br>
Wrt to the version at 19:00, why do you skip the 1/s block and
adds an INTEGRAL_m block in your sent version ?<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>OK, you have switched the positions of your integral and
proportional branches.<br>
Are INTEGRAL_m and INTEGRAL_f blocks equivalent? INTEGRAL_f has
less parameters.</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>