[Bugzilla] [Bug 15378] Samuel GOUGEON has commented the bug

[bugzilla.admin at scilab.org]

http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15378
--------- Bug Summary -----------
filter function is very slow compared to GNU Octave for long FIR's

---------- Changed by ------------
sgougeon at free.fr

---------- What changed ----------

--- Comment #4 from Samuel GOUGEON <sgougeon at free.fr> ---
(In reply to Yash Aggarwal from comment #2)
> For octave same commands give: 
> Elapsed time is 0.33xxxx seconds.

(In reply to Samuel GOUGEON from comment #1)
> With Scilab 6.0.1 for Windows 7 64 bits:
> --> toc()
>  ans  =
>    0.3219537

With Octave 4.2.1, on the same computer:
>> tic(); filter(b,1,x); toc()
Elapsed time is 0.52503 seconds.

So, Scilab 6.0.1 is quite faster than Octave 4.2.1 for this filter() benchmark.
But Octave is not Matlab. Nor is its price.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/bugzilla/attachments/20180310/f3996c68/attachment.htm>