[Localization] Scilab polish UI

[Yuri Chornoivan]

написане Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:46:58 +0300, Sylvestre Ledru-4 [via Scilab /  
Xcos - Mailing Lists Archives] <ml-node+s994242n4027518h64 at n3.nabble.com>:

>
>
> On 01/10/2013 10:44, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
>> написане Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:32:40 +0300, Raknor [via Scilab / Xcos -
>> Mailing Lists Archives] <[hidden email]
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4027517&i=0>>:
> [...]
>>
>> There are several FOSS solutions for translations and LP/Rosetta is now
>> the worst of them.
> Which one would you recommend ?
>
> Thanks
> Sylvestre

The most versatile and flexible is Transifex [1]. Advantages:

1. Adopted by many FOSS projects (e.g. Fedora, Xfce). It is free for any  
free project.

2. Advanced interface for translators and developers.

3. Fine separation by teams and inside teams (administrators, reviewers,  
translators).

4. Fast and reliable. There were no breakages without warning for 3 years.  
And I do not remember the case with lost translations.

5. Inbuilt fuzzy matching, translation memory per project, glossaries and  
discussions about translations.

6. Inbuilt system for reporting translation bugs.

7. Instant uploading of translation catalogs. No need to wait in the queue  
for off-line translations, they are instantly will be here.

8. Notification system for whole project and for separate catalogs.

9. All translation can be downloaded in their places with one tx-client  
command. tx-client in a milti-platform application.

10. Zero efforts on administration. Indifex does this.

11. Uncomplicated interface. Those who worked with Wordbee and other  
commercial CATs will appreciate this. ;)

https://www.transifex.com/features/translation-management/

Disadvantages:

1. No direct integration with git. Translation manager or dedicated  
developer should push translation in repo by himself.

2. Poor branches management. It is not deadly easy to translate stable and  
development branches at the same time.

3. No direct attribution for translators. It is impossible to know who  
translated what without Transifex cloud.

4. No word-by-word fuzzy matching in online editor.

Weblate [2]. Advantages:

1. Direct integration into git. Ready to release translations will be  
instantly committed to repo with no efforts from developers.

2. Proper attribution of translations. Anybody will know who translated  
what from git log.

3. Very fast online editor.

Disadvantages:

1. Need efforts to support Scilab native instance and server.

2. Somewhat ascetic due to the limited number of developers.

Zanata [3]:

1. Red Hat's translation system on well-tested Java solutions (well, not  
officially, but...).

2. No need to waste time on administration. Everybody can register  
projects on https://translate.zanata.org/

3. Word-by-word comparison for fuzzy matches.

Disadvantages:

Same as Transifex 1-3.

Pootle [4]. Advantages:

1. Adopted by many FOSS projects (LO, Apache OO.o, etc.)

2. Ability to download all catalogs as one zip archive.

Disadvantages:

Same as Transifex 1-3.

[1] https://www.transifex.com/

[2] http://weblate.org/en/

[3] http://zanata.org/

[4] http://pootle.translatehouse.org/




--
View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Re-Localization-Scilab-polish-UI-tp4027517p4027519.html
Sent from the Scilab localization - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/localization/attachments/20131001/cdcef6e0/attachment.htm>