[scilab-Users] SEP #57: comet()

Serge Steer Serge.Steer at inria.fr
Fri Apr 29 16:49:30 CEST 2011


 -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Samuel Gougeon [mailto:Samuel.Gougeon at univ-lemans.fr] 
> Envoyé : vendredi 29 avril 2011 00:08
> À : users at lists.scilab.org
> Objet : [scilab-Users] SEP #57: comet()
> 
> Hello Serge,
> 
> Despite the SEP #57 has not yet been published on the mailing lists, i saw
> it yesterday in CodeReview: http://codereview.scilab.org/#change,3868
> and i have discovered and tested comet(). Thank you for this nice new macro!
> Some short discussion occurred about it  two months ago:
> http://mailinglists.scilab.org/comet-command-tt2631854.html
> 
> I have a couple of question & remark about it:
> i run the first example, and i was wondering how to get it in an isoviewed
> axes. Unless pre-creating and setting an axes as wished and then run comet()
> in it, it is presently not possible to specified the isoview attribute when
> running comet().
Right, but it is easy to pre-setting the isoview property. I add it into
the first example
> This could be useful, since here a post-setting is not really enough.
> 
> IMO, in the SEP's rationale as well as in the comet help page, explaining in
> which way comet() and paramfplot2d() differ would be welcome.
As these function have quite different functionalities, I am not
convinced that it can be useful. The first one  animates y=f(t) for t
and the second animates f(x,t) for t.

> Moreover, adding paramfplot2d() in the see Also section would likely be
> convenient.
> 
Done, I also slightly modified the paramfplot2d and comet help pages to
make their respective role clearer (at least I hope so...)
> Reading you soon
> Samuel

Thanks for the remarks.

Serge



More information about the users mailing list