[Scilab-users] On parameters passing by name in scilab functions

[Samuel Gougeon]

Le 27/02/2017 à 19:36, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
> .../...
> So, Tim is right. Calls with named parameters make the code fragile, 
> or make somewhat harder to code the analysis of input arguments in a 
> robust way.
> /This coding way still increases functions overheads, that make them 
> slower./

Hmmm, actually, i don't really think so. It would be more robust but 
also more straightforward and readable to test the existence of input 
parameters according to their name instead of according to their number 
and position.
But this is not the way used in most functions definitions.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170227/cb9a8f29/attachment.htm>