[Scilab-users] Follow-up Re: {EXT} Re: Scilab 6 problem with "Prettify"

Claus Futtrup cfuttrup at gmail.com
Fri Sep 8 19:57:27 CEST 2017


Hi all

I see Scinotes supports "Execute file with echo" ... so I did that (and 
stopped the execution in its tracks). This is the code which gives me an 
invalid buffer error:

--> // ---- Change active directory to script directory ----
--> [units,typs,nams]=file(); // nams(1) = script file name incl. path
--> fpathname=strsplit(nams(1), [filesep()]); // disp(b($-1));
--> scriptpath = get_absolute_file_path(fpathname($));
--> chdir(scriptpath);
Invalid buffer.
--> // ---- READ CONFIG FILE ----

The scriptpath variable is empty. When I look at the commands, it seems 
the logic has changes since 5.5 so that instead of nams(1) one should 
use nams(2) instead, but nams(2) doesn't contain the script path. 
Instead (on Windows 10) it contains a link to a temporary file in 
AppData/Local/Temp ... and the file is named (randomly, I suppose): 
LOAD_INTO_SCILAB-17 84290624451915792.sce

So - please let me know, how do I now determine where my script is 
located? (So that I can save output data to the same folder)

Thanks.

P.S. It seems I still have an unresolved problem with the Prettify code 
that I've copied into my script. I wonder if Pierre Vuillemin is willing 
to help by providing suitable code for Scilab 6 - and please let me know 
where (and how) to pick it up without errors.

/Claus

On 08-09-2017 19:47, Claus Futtrup wrote:
> Hi all
>
> First follow-up. I completely removed the entire section of Prettify 
> code, and all instances of calls to the prettify function was 
> commented out. This executes fine in Scilab 5.5.
>
> In Scilab 6 I still get the "Invalid buffer." response, but now it can 
> execute repeatedly. I just gotta chase down what buffer, etc. ... you 
> know, the error which is not listed in the error table: 
> https://help.scilab.org/docs/6.0.0/en_US/error_table.html
>
> Best regards,
> Claus
>
> On 08-09-2017 16:48, Claus Futtrup wrote:
>> Hi Christophe
>>
>> Good points. I guess one thing I could do is to delete the entire 
>> Prettify from my file (and not call Prettify). Then see if Scilab 6 
>> complains.
>>
>> It's weird, though, that the errors are prior to execution of any 
>> code. I guess Scilab first "reads" the entire code somehow and if 
>> there's anything less than perfect, it breaks and cannot start 
>> stepping through the code.
>>
>> /Claus
>>
>> On 08-09-2017 09:43, Dang Ngoc Chan, Christophe wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>> De : Pierre Vuillemin
>>>> Envoyé : jeudi 7 septembre 2017 22:20
>>>>
>>>> Or you may want to comment suspicious parts of your code until 
>>>> there is no more error....
>>> A very efficient way to isolate the error is to use dichotomy.
>>>
>>> Normally, the core of your script should consist in calling functions.
>>> So remove the first half of the functions and see if you get the error.
>>> If not, remove the other half.
>>> You can then isolate in which half your function is.
>>> Remove then the first half of the problematic half etc.
>>>
>>> If both fail, then the problematic part is in the core
>>> And you can isolate it in the same way.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christophe Dang Ngoc Chan
>>> Mechanical calculation engineer
>>> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
>>> If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail 
>>> in error), please notify the sender immediately and destroy this 
>>> e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the 
>>> material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> users at lists.scilab.org
>>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>




More information about the users mailing list