[Scilab-users] Curing scf() & figure() slowliness: a good target for Scilab 6.0.1

[Samuel Gougeon]

Le 27/02/2017 à 12:58, Clément David a écrit :
> Hi Samuel,
>
> This is clearly a regression : there probably some synchronization issue (CPUs are not busy at all),
> could you report a bug on it please ?

Done here: http://bugzilla.scilab.org/15035

All regressions -- especially coming from Scilab 5.4.0 up to now, but 
even before -- would be excellent targets for the GSOC 2018.
I have started making a list of them. I will put it on the Wiki.

It is somewhat vain to add new features to Scilab if useful or even 
mandatory existing ones are slowly but surely getting eroded, sometimes 
in a blocking way.

Samuel