[Scilab-users] [question] xcos yielding different result than SIMULINK

[Samuel Gougeon]

Le 10/02/2022 à 11:06, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Le 10/02/2022 à 10:35, Foad Sojoodi Farimani a écrit :
>> I had initially asked the question here 
>> <https://discordapp.com/channels/384316553497280512/384325768685027328/941093238436134912> 
>> on xcos Discord channel <https://discord.gg/KeG3rdQ>.
>> Basically, I want to replicate this SIMULINK tutorial 
>> <https://youtu.be/PRFCBVTFy90> in xcos, and so far you may see the 
>> .zcox file in the attachment. However, my plots in xcos are quite 
>> different from the ones in the above YouTube video.
>
>
> The video is 26mn long, with several versions of the diagram. Which 
> version are you addressing?
> Wrt to the version at 19:00, why do you skip the 1/s block and adds an 
> INTEGRAL_m block in your sent version ?
>

OK, you have switched the positions of your integral and proportional 
branches.
Are INTEGRAL_m and INTEGRAL_f blocks equivalent? INTEGRAL_f has less 
parameters.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.scilab.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20220210/4da7ed33/attachment.htm>