[Scilab-Dev] Oh scilab!what a beaut you are you are if only you'd build without the war

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 10:47 +0100, bv a écrit :
> On Friday 29 October 2010 05:58:23 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 03:28 +0100, bv a écrit :
> > > Greetings,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I   am atempting  to compile scilab-5.2.2 on  a machine with these:-
> > > ---cpu-amd64 2 cores
> > > ---o/s CBLFS linux (64-bit only) compiled from sources kernel-2.6.32
> > > ---numerical progs: atlas3.9.26,lapack-3.2.2 and umfpack~co
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have  umfpack and co in /usr/local/numerics
> > > rt [ ~ ]# ls /usr/local/numerics/lib
> > > libamd.a  libcamd.a     libcerbla.a   libcolamd.a   libcxsparse.a 
> > > libldl.a libumfpack.a
> > > libbtf.a  libccolamd.a  libcholmod.a  libcsparse.a  libklu.a      
> > > libspqr.a rt [ ~ ]#
> > 
> > Usually, Scilab is expecting some dynamic libraries to build correctly.
> > [...]
> > 
> 
> ....ehm here is the home of SuiteSparse
> http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/SuiteSparse/
> 
> and as far as I know  all its components  are built using the UFconfig utility 
> AND static libs are  the default.  
> If anyone on list knows  how to  to hack UFconfig or use say cmake to generate 
> shared libs  for the SuiteSparse components
> please let me know. 
Debian & Ubuntu packages are built using these patches which enables the
shared lib build:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-scicomp/suitesparse.git;a=tree;f=debian/patches;h=0ac060b2a39ad6586040ef42f2a9bb8b733a7980;hb=fcdd9cd529c01240b8e014d329c0089afd2e8cf3


Sylvestre